Part 1: Are CliftonStrengths team workshops worth it?

Part 1: Are CliftonStrengths team workshops worth it?

One of the most common reasons teams contact me to run CliftonStrengths workshops is this: they want to strengthen team spirit and help team members get to know each other from a different perspective.

But very often, the real value of these conversations lies somewhere else.

Business and HR leaders are not just looking for a one-off “feel-good event”. They’re looking for a practical way to help their teams communicate better, understand each other better, and manage pressure and workload more effectively.

Now, I’m normally not a big fan of psychometrics.

Many of these tools can feel like they place people in boxes that are a little too neat, and a little too tight for comfort.

That hasn’t been my experience with CliftonStrengths.

I first encountered it while recovering from a burnout eleven years ago. It gave me a new perspective on how I show up in the world. More importantly, it didn’t make me feel boxed in. Instead, it opened up a conversation with my coach at the time, Gaby Lederer-Ganse, about some of my natural talents—and allowed me to define for myself how they show up in the world, while recognising that this is only one piece of the much larger puzzle of “who I am”.

That experience led me to become a certified CliftonStrengths coach through Gallup (the organisation behind the assessment). I also became the first (and only) certified internal coach at my former employer. Back then, there was little demand for CliftonStrengths. Most teams opted for the DISC profile instead, which I personally disliked (but that’s a topic for another post…).

Then COVID hit. And suddenly, many line managers were looking for new ways to bring their teams together during a very challenging period.

Common criticisms to CliftonStrengths

Now, I’m well aware that CliftonStrengths has its critics.

Sometimes I see people question its validity, even though Gallup is considered to be a highly reputable and trusted source for public opinion polling, social research, and workplace analytics, and is known for its rigorous scientific methods. Having said that, I do concede that many of the validation studies have been conducted and reported by Gallup itself, rather than independent academic researchers, which may understandably lead to some skepticism.

However, a much more common critique I’ve seen is that it’s “too positive”—that it only talks about strengths and ignores weaknesses.

So let’s dispel that myth right away.

CliftonStrengths is not just about strengths.

What actually happens in a CliftonStrengths workshop

When I do individual report debriefs and run team strengths workshops, we certainly explore your strengths—i.e., your preferred ways to get things done, influence, analyse information, make decisions, and build relationships. In other words, the lenses through which you see and interact with the world around you.

But we also look at something equally important: how those same strengths can sometimes get in the way. How they can drive you—and other people—crazy when they are overused or go on “overdrive”.

  • The colleague whose stamina and drive for getting things done start making it feel like work matters more than people.
  • The colleague who keeps analysing when others want to decide.
  • The one who pushes for action while others still want to manage risks.
  • The one who keeps changing targets and plans when others just want to move forward with “a” plan.

We also explore the themes at the bottom of your report—the ones that don’t come as naturally to you but may come very naturally to others on the team.

Looking at these perspectives helps teams understand why tensions or friction may arise—especially in times of pressure and stress.

What looks like a personality problem in teams might be strengths colliding...

And because we look at all of this through a strengths lens, even conversations about weaknesses become constructive. Why? Because the focus shifts from deficiency to difference, and from blame to understanding.

When teams become aware of these dynamics, it becomes much easier to assume positive intent and give each other the benefit of the doubt when things go sideways.

So, to answer my own question…

Are CliftonStrengths team workshops worth it?

After having designed and led many CliftonStrengths team workshops, yes—I do believe they are worth it.

While psychometrics as a scientific discipline is complex and debated, the value of tools like CliftonStrengths in my work lies more in creating structured conversations that help teams understand and collaborate with each other.

But this comes with a caveat.

If a strengths workshop is treated as a one-off exercise, you and your team may end up investing a substantial amount of time and money simply to have “a good time”. And there is certainly value in that!

However, if you want more sustainable results and a real impact, you want to find ways to embed the strengths philosophy into your way of working as a team.

It then becomes a marathon, not a sprint.

That starts with each team member truly understanding and owning their individual CliftonStrengths report—whether they do so with the help of a coach, through their own exploration of the many online resources available, or both.

Just as importantly, the conversation needs to stay alive within the team.

How you may ask?

That will be the topic of my next blog post on the topic.

Now, it’s your turn…

If you’ve been part of a CliftonStrengths team workshop, I’d love to hear: what worked? what didn’t?

If you’ve taken CliftonStrengths yourself, I’d love to know: what surprised you most when you first saw your results?

And, if you’re curious about what a strengths conversation could open up for you or your team, feel free to reach out. No obligation—just a conversation about what new perspectives and opportunities this kind of exploration might offer.

With love,

Dina 🫶🏽

PS : all em dashes are my own.

Your weekly poem: CAGED BIRD—or the world of coaching in the advent of AI

Your weekly poem: CAGED BIRD—or the world of coaching in the advent of AI

🌿 A poem a day keeps the blues away… 

I’ve just come out of an Association for Coaching AI Virtual café session that left me feeling both angry and depressed… I will probably be writing an article about it at some point, but I’m not ready yet. What I can offer you today is raw. And then I remembered Angelou’s poem.

So, I’m offering you her poem as a way to express how I feel right now towards the coaching profession in general, and AI coaching agents specifically.

 

CAGED BIRD

🌻 A free bird leaps
on the back of the wind
and floats downstream
till the current ends
and dips his wing
in the orange sun rays
and dares to claim the sky.

But a bird that stalks
down his narrow cage
can seldom see through
his bars of rage
his wings are clipped and
his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.

The caged bird sings
with a fearful trill
of things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom.

The free bird thinks of another breeze
and the trade winds soft through the sighing trees
and the fat worms waiting on a dawn bright lawn
and he names the sky his own.

But a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams
his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream
his wings are clipped and his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.

The caged bird sings
with a fearful trill
of things unknown
but longed for still
and his tune is heard
on the distant hill
for the caged bird
sings of freedom. 🌻

—Maya Angelou

 

Caged…

… in the belief that simulation is as good as reality. That placing words next to each other based on statistical probability is the same as two human beings making meaning together.

… in the belief that relationship is secondary. In the reduction of relational coaching to having a “nice relationship”—as if presence were decoration, only needed at the beginning of a session.

… in the doubt of our own value, experience, and humanity—so much so—that we think AI can emulate our “knowledge”, as if we were walking encyclopaedias to be downloaded for greater effect.

… in frameworks that have reduced coaching to a set of competency boxes to be ticked—and in the ensuing illusion that if AI can tick those same boxes, it must be coaching.

… even in our own tools and techniques, as if coaching were a set of formulaic transactions, processes and structures you download—rather than a way of being you spend a lifetime developing.

… in an illusion of false promises—calling it democratisation when it’s just cost-cutting dressed up as access—creating a caste system where those with least get the least.

… in the pretence of progress—at enormous environmental cost, in a world where millions still have no reliable internet connection to access the “solution” being sold to them.

Caged …

Caged …

I have no words of wisdom or hope to offer you today… except that I REFUSE to be caged.
I did not leave my golden cage to be entrapped in a bronze one—and nor have you.

I am the free bird.
I leap on the back of the wind
and float downstream
till the current ends
and dip my wing
in the orange sun rays
and dare to claim the sky.

Who are you? And what do you dare to claim?

 

🦋 Happy Sunday everyone! 🦋

With love,

Dina 🫶🏽

PS: I’m speaking my truth from a relational, Gestalt-informed tradition—and I’m well aware not everyone shares this frame.

Resources:

  • This week’s song is Freedom! ’90 by George Michael

Why coaching skills training are turning managers into robots—and what to do about it

Why coaching skills training are turning managers into robots—and what to do about it

Something very strange happens to managers who attend a coaching skills training
—they lose their ability to speak!

I was invited to observe a coaching skills training for managers to see if I would wish to facilitate the programme—and I left wanting to rewrite it.

Meet John

Picture John (fictitious name). A highly accomplished expert in his field and a leader. Eloquent, well spoken, and you can tell he’s a very bright fella’…

He’s just been taught that coaching means being neutral (are we ever?!?), holding no opinions or thoughts of his own, and only asking open-ended questions (except for any starting with “why” that is). Translation: be a robot.

All of a sudden, John is making very strange, weirdly structured sentences. In fact, at times, they don’t even make any sense. The words are English but the meaning escapes comprehension. What’s going on?

Now, some coaches would argue that’s just what learning coaching does. As a manager, you’re used to “telling”—so like any new language, it takes a while to get used to it… Bull! (pardon my French)

Here’s what I think is going on

We’re witnessing the discomfort of trying to perform formulaically, and being incongruent between what you think, feel, and say.

It has nothing to do with how difficult the coaching mindset is. It’s because we’re asking the Johns of this world to talk like robots instead of human beings.

And here’s the really sad part

HR leaders will view the training as a success.

Leaders will pat themselves on the shoulder for learning a new language.

Meanwhile, Jane (fictitious name)—an employee in that same training—is telling our breakout group how her manager went through this exact training a while back, but sounds so “phony” she doesn’t want to open up to him.

That’s the story the HR leader and line manager will never hear.

What I suggest instead

When I run coaching skills training for managers, we cut through that noise.

I don’t want you to talk like me or some coaching guru.
I don’t want you to tick competency boxes.

I want you to sound like you—genuinely you—while openly relating to another human being and making the conversation about them.

And—very importantly—we openly address the elephant in the room: you can’t be neutral. You’re human. You have countless thoughts, opinions, feelings, and sensations—and rather than pretending otherwise, we explore how to use them purposefully.

We also acknowledge the fact that you wear multiple hats at once: expert, leader, people manager. That can create tension and interesting power dynamics in the room. And any training that doesn’t tackle those head on is doing its participants a disservice.

And we don’t shy away from this one either: not everyone wants to be coached by their manager. That’s their right—and ignoring it helps no one.

So—

if you want your managers to sound neutral, follow models, and talk like robots, by all means, continue doing what you’re doing.

If you want real cultural change, let’s chat!

 

Agree? Disagree? I’d love to hear from you.

 

With love,

Dina 🫶🏽

 

PS : all em dashes are my own. What can I say—I can’t help myself. 🙂

Recommended resources: 

“We’re not here to be quiet”—Your weekly poem on being REAL

“We’re not here to be quiet”—Your weekly poem on being REAL

🌿 A poem a day keeps the blues away… 

REAL

🌻 I’ve cried when I’m happy
And cried when I’m sad
I’ve smiled through the good times
And smiled through the bad

I’ve screamed in excitement
I’ve screamed out in pain
I’ve gasped at the sunshine
And gasped at the rain

I’ve laughed when I’m nervous
And when I’m elated
I’ve sighed with contentment
And when I’m deflated

I’ve sung when I’m lonely
And sung in a crowd
I’ve shouted when angry
And when I’ve been proud

‘Cause whether we’re up
Or we’re riding a low
Our feelings are desperate
For somewhere to go

We can’t keep them trapped
And locked up in a cage –
They force their way out
‘Cause they need to escape

And sometimes we’re told
That emotions are weakness
That feeling is flawed
If we let it defeat us

But how can this be?
Surely this must be wrong
For what could be weak
About something so strong

Cannot be tamed
Can’t be kept down
And cannot be contained

So when you next shout
Or you laugh or you cry
You scream or you smile
Or let out a sigh

Whatever the reason
Just let yourself feel
We’re not here to be quiet –
We’re here to be real 🌻

—Becky Hemsley
published in “Letters from life”

🪴 Feelings want their rightful place

This week I had the pleasure of supporting John Leary-Joyce on his Gestalt Coaching foundation course, with a remarkably gifted group of participants.

The focus was on the coach’s use of self—showing up fully, bringing their own present-moment experience into the room as live data to facilitate the client’s own embodied experience. In other words: to feel alongside. To be real, together.

Becky’s poem captures something the Gestalt tradition has always known: that feelings want and deserve their rightful place—be it in a coaching relationship, at home, or at work.

🪴 Neither tidy nor optional

The poem is a great reminder of the power of feelings and their versatility.

I cry when I’m happy and when I’m sad.
I scream out of excitement or pain.
I sing when I’m lonely or overjoyed.

Whatever the context or reason, and however they show up, feelings allow us to be real.

Our emotions are neither tidy nor optional. They are relentlessly looking for a way out. And perhaps the most radical thing we can do—especially at work—is to stop pretending otherwise.

Which raises the question: how much space do we actually create at work for people to feel—and to be real—without panic?

For most companies I know, the answer is “very little space”, because emotions are messy, can be scary, and we don’t always know how to deal with them in ourselves, let alone in others…

You’d be surprised at the number of times I’ve had a manager come to me, in panic, because their employee cried during a check-in or a team meeting…

🪴 The paradox at the heart of it

The poem holds a paradox at its heart
—that the very thing we’re told makes us weak is the thing that makes us real;
—that the very thing we perceive as weak is in fact “so strong” it “cannot be tamed”, “be kept down”, or “be contained”.

Sometimes feelings arrive uninvited; they often refuse to be reasoned with; and they will inevitably find a way out—one way or another.

And yet we spend so much energy at work building walls around them.

I understand why—I really do.

But I wonder if those walls are the best way to create a healthy productive environment… or if they’re actually making things worse.

Because here’s the deeper paradox:

🪴 When feelings burst

The more an environment values “head” over “heart”, the more it encourages the stifling of feelings, and the more those feelings will eventually burst through in ways that are far more disruptive than if they’d been given space in the first place.

Unaddressed emotions don’t disappear. They calcify into disengagement, fear, absenteeism, and sickness.

That’s when managers start yelling at employees; employees burst out of meetings, punching a wall; colleagues stab each other in the back—and the rest burn out.

And, because we are ever so polite with one another
—either no one names what’s happening and the cycle quietly poisons the whole environment,
—or someone gets fired for ‘inappropriate behaviour’, only for the pattern to repeat somewhere else, with someone else.

This is the paradox Becky names—and one I work with companies to navigate every day.

It’s messy. And yet, putting our heads in the sand won’t make feelings go away.

(A note on context: I’m not suggesting every workplace becomes a therapy room, or that a surgeon pauses mid-operation to process their anger at their boss. There’s a meaningful difference between expressing feelings responsibly and being overwhelmed by them. What I am suggesting is that many workplaces seem to be allergic to emotion altogether.)

🪴 “How are you?”; “How do you feel?”

One of the things John challenges us on is finding different ways to ask someone—a client, a colleague—”How do you feel?” In fact, he bans the phrase from his foundation course. 😅

On the one hand, a question like “How are you?” has become a wall in itself—polite, well-meaning, and very easy to deflect.

But even a genuine “How do you feel?” is often met with “I’m not sure.” Why?

Because we’ve lost our connection to our body, and without that connection it becomes much more difficult to name our feelings—until suddenly one day, someone bursts into tears in a meeting or loses their temper with a direct report…

And this is precisely why learning to do better than “How are you?” or “How do you feel?” matters—because the first step to creating space for feelings is learning how to reach them.

🪴 So what might it look like in practice?

It starts with leaders who are willing to go first—who model what it looks like to be real, responsibly. When a leader normalises emotion, they give everyone around them permission to do the same.

And it starts small: a team meeting that opens with something other than the agenda; a culture that treats someone crying not as a crisis to manage, but as an opportunity to demonstrate curiosity and compassion; a colleague who says “You seem a bit down today” instead of “How are you?”.

None of this requires a therapist on staff. It requires a change in what we allow ourselves to notice, and what we choose to do with it.

🪴 So, two questions for you this Sunday:

📌 When was the last time you allowed yourself to express your true feelings—to be real?

📌 How else could you ask someone “How do you feel?” without using those words? I’d love to read your thoughts in the comments below 👇🏽.

And I’ll reveal some of John’s and my favourites in the comments once you’ve had your turn!

 

🦋 Happy Sunday everyone! 🦋

With love,

Dina 🫶🏽

Balthazar, the donkey

Picture of Balthazar: my new friend at SurVojo.ch and teacher of healthy emotional expression

Resources:

  • Where to visit Balthazar: If you live nearby Binningen (CH), you can visit Balthazar (and Fabian) at the Sur Vojo farm (survojo.ch). You will find two Grand noir du Berry there – Balthazar is the smaller one. The other, and much larger one, is Lotus. 
  • This week’s song is Aerials, cover by The Barefoot Movement


Gestalt coaching: an introduction

Gestalt coaching: an introduction

I recently offered a free interactive 90-minute webinar for coaches curious about Gestalt coaching—an opportunity for them to bring all their questions, ask me anything, watch a demo, and learn about my upcoming Gestalt Coaching Practice Labs and Relational Community of Practice.

For those of you who may have been interested but missed the registration, I’ve created a 20-minute clip from the webinar, which I am sharing below.

In it I talk about:
🪴 what the word Gestalt actually means
🪴 figure & ground (yes, the nerdy but very useful bit)
🪴 why I think so much of coaching lives in what happens between two people
🪴 and there’s also a short reflection from someone who took part in my Gestalt Practice Labs last year. In her words:

“One of the best things I’ve done (…) a small investment for a really big impact”

🎥 You can watch the clip below or directly on YouTube:

If the video sparks curiosity or questions about Gestalt, feel free to e-mail me or comment—I’m happy to answer questions, talk it through, or just compare notes.

And if you are interested in the recording of the full 90-minute webinar “Gestalt Coaching Unpacked: Ask me anything + live Demo”, please e-mail me or comment below. The video is unlisted, but I’d be happy to send you a private link to access it.


Love,
Dina 🫶🏽

Recommended resources: 

The tyranny of the pursuit of happiness and purpose

The tyranny of the pursuit of happiness and purpose

I see many posts in my feed lately on how to help you “be more happy”, “find your purpose”, and urge you to “pursue your IKIGAI”—that magical intersect between what you love to do, can do, the world needs, and gets you paid… that ONE purpose in life that “can set you free”… but, does it really?

What if that’s all a mirage… another pop-psychology soundbite regurgitated to keep you blind to what already is…
… trapped in a fixed destination: the tyrannical pursuit of that ONE purpose, 
… stuck chasing unicorns in some impending future,
forgetting to live in the moment.

So, what’s my proposal?

Don’t pursue happiness…
or purpose…
pursue meaning instead.

The beauty of meaning, as opposed to purpose, is that it’s not something you chase or declare once and for all. It’s something that emerges and evolves—
as you live your life, 
as you engage with the world around you, 
as you embrace the people around you.

Meaning is found in life itself… in every moment of every day.
And because meaning is ever so present, it seems fleeting.

You know how, when there’s a constant repeating sound in your environment, you stop hearing it? I remember, when I lived in Egypt, my bedroom overlooked a train station, and there was a long loud train whistle at least every 45 minutes or so. So, I stopped hearing it, and I would only notice it when my friends on the phone would complain about that loud long whistle in the background…

That’s what I think happens to meaning.

We don’t see it anymore, and therefore think it’s missing from our lives. Not because it’s not there, but because our mind is constantly engaged in that hypothetical future—the one that’s holding our salvation, finally fulfilling all of our hopes and dreams, and “sets us free”.

So, we get lost in that futuristic maze…
… start chasing that next dopamine kick,
and numb ourselves with soundbites that shine like diamonds but are hollow inside.

To be clear, I’m not suggesting we stop dreaming or hoping all together…

I’m suggesting that we focus on recognising meaning in what already is, first…
… in the circumstances we are already in,
… the roles we already play,
… the people who are already in our lives.

I make a living supporting those who find themselves in a place of transition. Sometimes that transition is forced upon them by an employer or life in general. But many of them choose to pursue something different that can hopefully fill a sense of void or confusion or longing…

And my job is to help them first understand “what is”, so that they can step into “what can be” with much more clarity and, dare I say, purpose. But that purpose is not the same as your IKIGAI… It’s a sharpened perspective…

Here’s a final thought on meaning.

When we pursue it, it doesn’t promise eternal bliss or comfort… in fact, it can get terribly uncomfortable—at times even painful. But it does promise us this: drive, energy, passion, determination, stamina, resilience to walk the mile… a sense of being “whole”… and, if we can pay enough attention to its sound, in the “here and now”, it can give us wings to explore the unchartered… and literally “set us free”…

Having said all that,

if meaning is still not enough for you, and you really, really, want to understand your ONE purpose in life—here’s one for you:

LOVE.

That’s our one and only purpose: to learn how to love one another—unconditionally. AGAPE—that’s our purpose.

How we get there?

That’s life.
Your life. My life. Our life.
And the meaning we make of it—
every moment of every day.

Here’s to a meaningful 2026!

PS: No AI has been used or harmed in the writing of this post. All em-dashes and stream of consciousness are my own.

Recommended resources: